AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and NVIDIA Tesla K80m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 65% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 562 MHz
Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 876 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
4.6x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 300 Watt
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz

Launch date	12 June 2017 vs 17 November 2014
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 562 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 876 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 300 Watt
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

55.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s
9.8x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 512
7x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
6x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 4 GB
Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18475 vs 10571
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.651 vs 29.959
Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1653.567 vs 864.134
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.882 vs 2.893
Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 vs 49.305
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 258.278 vs 122.245

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 2496 vs 512
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
Maximum memory size	2x 12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	18475 vs 10571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	62.651 vs 29.959
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1653.567 vs 864.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.882 vs 2.893
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	86.984 vs 49.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	258.278 vs 122.245

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10571

18475

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.959

62.651

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

864.134

1653.567

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.893

6.882

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

49.305

86.984

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

122.245

258.278

Name	AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100	NVIDIA Tesla K80m
PassMark - G3D Mark	2587
PassMark - G2D Mark	432
Geekbench - OpenCL	10571	18475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	29.959	62.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	864.134	1653.567
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.893	6.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	49.305	86.984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	122.245	258.278
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3607
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3607
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100	NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler 2.0
Code name	Lexa	GK210
Launch date	12 June 2017	17 November 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$199
Place in performance rating	723	725
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	876 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	562 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	2x 4,373 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	2x 2496
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	300 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2x 12 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB / s	2x 240.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5