NVIDIA Tesla M10 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M10 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M10
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 9.2x more texture fill rate: 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 49.4 billion / sec
- 5x more pipelines: 4x 640 vs 512
- 4.2x better floating-point performance: 4x 1,672 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 244 Watt
- 21.3x more maximum memory size: 4x 8 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.191 vs 40.048
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 50.918 vs 32.378
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 180.026 vs 132.363
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 9 November 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 49.4 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 4x 640 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 244 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4x 8 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.191 vs 40.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.918 vs 32.378 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 180.026 vs 132.363 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4630 vs 3046
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 490 vs 385
- Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15182 vs 10282
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 872.651 vs 814.192
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5953 vs 5204
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3693
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3306
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5953 vs 5204
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3693
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3306
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1544 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4630 vs 3046 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 vs 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15182 vs 10282 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 vs 814.192 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 vs 5204 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 vs 5204 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3306 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M10
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla M10 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3046 | 4630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 490 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10282 | 15182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.191 | 40.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 814.192 | 872.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.918 | 32.378 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 180.026 | 132.363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5204 | 5953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3693 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5204 | 5953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3693 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 | 3357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla M10 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 9 November 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 626 | 620 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Price now | $289.88 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1544 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 4x 640 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec | 49.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 244 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | One 6-pin and One 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4x 8 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 4x 83.2 GB / s | 192.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 4x 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla M10 with others
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1800 XL
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
IntelHD Graphics P4000
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
AMDFirePro W5100
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
NVIDIAT500 Mobile
