NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2050 and ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 448 vs 320
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 3092 MHz vs 800 MHz
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 10 September 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 448 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 3092 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 48 Watt vs 225 Watt
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 48 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2050
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.852 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 966.795 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.318 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 208 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 156 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
| Code name | GF100 | RV730 |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 10 September 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,699 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1076 | 1078 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 48 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 148.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3092 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
