NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2050 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 5.4x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 5.6x more pipelines: 448 vs 80
- 8.6x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 120 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
- 17.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36584 vs 2112
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 7 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 120 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 vs 2112 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 3092 MHz
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 3092 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2050
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 | 2112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.852 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 966.795 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.318 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 236 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1247 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1247 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1679 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF100 | Park |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,699 | |
Place in performance rating | 1076 | 1077 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 148.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3092 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2, GDDR2, DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |