NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2050 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36584 vs 10495
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.848 vs 9.373
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 966.795 vs 459.025
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.15 vs 0.906
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 27.022
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.318 vs 48.793
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 13 October 2009 |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 vs 10495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.848 vs 9.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 966.795 vs 459.025 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.15 vs 0.906 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 vs 27.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.318 vs 48.793 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- Around 79% higher pipelines: 800 vs 448
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 108 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 3092 MHz
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.0 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 448 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 3092 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2050
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | ATI Radeon HD 5770 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 | 10495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.848 | 9.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 966.795 | 459.025 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.15 | 0.906 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | 27.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.318 | 48.793 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1343 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2636 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2673 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2799 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2636 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2673 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2799 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | ATI Radeon HD 5770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF100 | Juniper |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 13 October 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,699 | $159 |
| Place in performance rating | 1090 | 1093 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | 208 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 148.4 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3092 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla M2050 with others
NVIDIATesla M2050 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5770
NVIDIATesla M2050 vs
ATIFirePro V4800
NVIDIATesla M2050 vs
AMDFirePro V5900
NVIDIATesla M2050 vs
AMDRadeon R7 250
NVIDIATesla M2050 vs
AMDFirePro M4150
NVIDIATesla M2050 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M340DX
