NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs ATI FirePro V4800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2050 and ATI FirePro V4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
- Around 12% higher pipelines: 448 vs 400
- Around 66% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 620.0 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- 21.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36584 vs 1672
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.848 vs 5.886
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 966.795 vs 321.782
- 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.15 vs 0.529
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 14.184
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.318 vs 56.777
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 26 April 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 400 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 620.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 vs 1672 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.848 vs 5.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 966.795 vs 321.782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.15 vs 0.529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 vs 14.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.318 vs 56.777 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V4800
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 16% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3092 MHz
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 3092 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2050
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V4800
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | ATI FirePro V4800 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 | 1672 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.848 | 5.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 966.795 | 321.782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.15 | 0.529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | 14.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.318 | 56.777 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1204 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1512 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2211 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1512 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2211 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | ATI FirePro V4800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF100 | Redwood |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 26 April 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,699 | $189 |
Place in performance rating | 1100 | 1102 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 627 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 148.4 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3092 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |