AMD FirePro M4150 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4150 and NVIDIA Tesla M2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 715 MHz vs 575 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3092 MHz
Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 3092 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2050
- Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 448 vs 384
- Around 88% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- 10.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36584 vs 3604
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 vs 3604 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4150
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M4150 | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 987 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3604 | 36584 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2181 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2181 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 966.795 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.318 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M4150 | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Opal | GF100 |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1097 | 1100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,100 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 148.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3092 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |