NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q vs ATI FireGL V3200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q and ATI FireGL V3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 574 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 16.1x more texture fill rate: 32.1 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 130 nm
- 48x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 128 MB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 236
- 15.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1306 vs 85
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 1 September 2004 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 130 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 236 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 vs 85 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V3200
- 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 46 Watt vs 225 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 46 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V3200
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | ATI FireGL V3200 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.784 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.512 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.125 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.533 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 236 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 | 85 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | ATI FireGL V3200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Rage 9 |
| Code name | GF100 | RV380 |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 1 September 2004 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,489 | |
| Place in performance rating | 779 | 778 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 130 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | |
| Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 46 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
