NVIDIA Tesla M2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 574 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 448 vs 112
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 280 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 96% higher memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 1600 MHz
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 8 January 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 448 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 280 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 78 Watt vs 225 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 78 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.005 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 372 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3285 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF100 | G92 |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 8 January 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,099 | $1,599 |
| Place in performance rating | 1327 | 1330 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Price now | $99.02 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.26 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 280 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 78 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |

