NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2075 and NVIDIA Tesla M2090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2075
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 574 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
- Around 30% better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 3132 MHz
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz vs 3132 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2075
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2075 | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GF110 | GF110 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,399 | |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1143 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | 1,331.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 248 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | 177.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | 3700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |