NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M6 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 8.7x more texture fill rate: 113.3 GTexel / s vs 13 billion / sec
- 24x more pipelines: 1536 vs 64
- 28.3x better floating-point performance: 3,625 gflops vs 128 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 12.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6226 vs 504
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 3 March 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s vs 13 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops vs 128 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6226 vs 504 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 vs 319
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 vs 319 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M6
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 | 407 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6226 | 504 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M6 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GM204 | G94 |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 386 | 384 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | 128 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s | 13 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Gigaflops | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |