AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA Tesla M6 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- 1122.7x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 113.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 9390
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 9390
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 vs 339
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3260
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 30 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1036 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s vs 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 vs 9390 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 vs 339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3260 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Around 9% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1408
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6172 vs 4948
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1408 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6172 vs 4948 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M6
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 9390 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36495 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | 339 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4948 | 6172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3260 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 378 | 376 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5300M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 150M
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla M6
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile
