NVIDIA Quadro P3000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3000 and NVIDIA Tesla M6 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1088 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6366 vs 6226
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 404 vs 319
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9579 vs 9390
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3260
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9579 vs 9390
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 30 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1088 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6366 vs 6226 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 vs 319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9579 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9579 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3260 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1280 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M6
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | NVIDIA Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6366 | 6226 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 319 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25862 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9579 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9579 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3260 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3489 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N17E-Q1 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 377 | 378 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1088 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168 GB / s | 160.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |