NVIDIA Tesla P40 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P40 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 367.4 GTexel / s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3072
- Around 72% better floating-point performance: 11,758 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 51% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12267 vs 11823
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62481 vs 40088
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 September 2016 vs 5 March 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 988 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s vs 285.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 3072 |
| Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops vs 6,844 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12267 vs 11823 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62481 vs 40088 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 687 vs 439
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 9538
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 9538
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 vs 439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13107 vs 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13107 vs 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P40
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12267 | 11823 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 439 | 687 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62481 | 40088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9538 | 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9538 | 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla P40 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP102 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 5 March 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,699 | $4,999 |
| Place in performance rating | 245 | 242 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 988 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops | 6,844 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 3072 |
| Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11,800 million | 8,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB / s | 317.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 6612 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla P40 with others
NVIDIATesla P40 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIATesla P40 vs
AMDRadeon R9 390 X2
NVIDIATesla P40 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIATesla P40 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000
NVIDIATesla P40 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
NVIDIATesla P40 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
