NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla T4 and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10909 vs 6211
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 127.622 vs 89.187
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 1434.496
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 7.656
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 vs 87.459
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 493.57
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 9603
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 9603

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X

• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 686 vs 596
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 1976
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1781
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 1976
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1781

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10909 6211
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	596 686
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	127.622 89.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3026.812 1434.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.798 7.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	119.936 87.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	910.721 493.57
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14076 9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1976 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1781 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14076 9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1976 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1781 3357

Compare specifications (specs)