NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 55407
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 2036.763
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 14.035
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 vs 27.417
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 819.934
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 11173
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 11173
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 vs 27 May 2016 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 vs 55407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 vs 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 vs 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 vs 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 vs 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 vs 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 vs 11173 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15554 vs 10751
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 vs 594
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 vs 127.622
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 1781
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 1781
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15554 vs 10751 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 vs 594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 vs 127.622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 1781 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10751 | 15554 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 594 | 886 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 55407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7546 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 | 27 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 268 | 265 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 10 GB/s |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |