NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1404 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 7012 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10684 vs 9078
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 592 vs 549
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 36713
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 13448
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 13448
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 vs 21 February 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1404 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 7012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10684 vs 9078 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 vs 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 vs 36713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 vs 13448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 vs 13448 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1139 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1976
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1781
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1976
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1781
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1139 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1781 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10684 | 9078 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 36713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 13448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 13448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 | 21 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 272 | 274 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1404 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1139 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 7012 MHz |