NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • 3x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 540 MHz
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
  • 2x better floating-point performance: 155.52 gflops vs 76.16 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
  • Around 62% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 47 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB (DDR3) vs 512 MB
  • Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz (DDR3) vs 700 MHz
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 319 vs 131
  • 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 136 vs 42
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 903 vs 449
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1455 vs 1397
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 903 vs 449
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1455 vs 1397
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 April 2011 vs 17 April 2007
Core clock speed 1620 MHz vs 540 MHz
Pipelines 48 vs 32
Floating-point performance 155.52 gflops vs 76.16 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 80 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 29 Watt vs 47 Watt
Maximum memory size 1 GB (DDR3) vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (DDR3) vs 700 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 319 vs 131
PassMark - G2D Mark 136 vs 42
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 903 vs 449
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1455 vs 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 903 vs 449
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1455 vs 1397

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT

  • Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 8.6 billion / sec vs 6.5 billion / sec
Texture fill rate 8.6 billion / sec vs 6.5 billion / sec

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
319
131
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
136
42
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
903
449
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1455
1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
903
449
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1455
1397
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 319 131
PassMark - G2D Mark 136 42
Geekbench - OpenCL 1277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 76.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 5.862
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.574
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 545
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 903 449
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1455 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 545
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 903 449
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1455 1397

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Tesla
Code name GF119 G84
Launch date 13 April 2011 17 April 2007
Launch price (MSRP) $59 $159
Place in performance rating 1603 1621
Price now $59.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 7.58

Technical info

Core clock speed 1620 MHz 540 MHz
CUDA cores 48
Floating-point performance 155.52 gflops 76.16 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 80 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 102 °C
Pipelines 48 32
Texture fill rate 6.5 billion / sec 8.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 29 Watt 47 Watt
Transistor count 292 million 289 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional) 2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support 16x PCI-E 2.0
Height 2.7" (6.9 cm)
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm) 170 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.2 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB (DDR3) 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 22.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (DDR3) 700 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR3
Standard memory config per GPU 256 MB

Technologies

CUDA
SLI