NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and NVIDIA RTX A6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 54% higher core clock speed: 2235 MHz vs 1455 MHz
  • Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 2520 MHz vs 1860 MHz
  • Around 52% higher pipelines: 16384 vs 10752
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
  • 15.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1297 vs 86
  • 9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 38287 vs 4237
  • Around 98% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9223 vs 4665
  • Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 98.472 vs 58.523
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2968.159 vs 2342.233
  • Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 317791 vs 193937
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 20 Sep 2022 vs 5 Oct 2020
Core clock speed 2235 MHz vs 1455 MHz
Boost clock speed 2520 MHz vs 1860 MHz
Pipelines 16384 vs 10752
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm vs 8 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 1297 vs 86
PassMark - G3D Mark 38287 vs 4237
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 9223 vs 4665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 98.472 vs 58.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2968.159 vs 2342.233
Geekbench - OpenCL 317791 vs 193937

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A6000

  • 484.5x more texture fill rate: 625.0 GTexel/s vs 1,290 GTexel/s
  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 450 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 24 GB
  • Around 52% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
  • Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 735.8 vs 582.642
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 625.0 GTexel/s vs 1,290 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 300 Watt vs 450 Watt
Maximum memory size 48 GB vs 24 GB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 735.8 vs 582.642
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 178.784 vs 178.756

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A6000

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1297
86
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
38287
4237
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
9223
4665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
582.642
735.8
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
98.472
58.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
178.756
178.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2968.159
2342.233
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
317791
193937
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 NVIDIA RTX A6000
PassMark - G2D Mark 1297 86
PassMark - G3D Mark 38287 4237
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 9223 4665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 582.642 735.8
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 98.472 58.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 178.756 178.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2968.159 2342.233
Geekbench - OpenCL 317791 193937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 0
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 23142
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 23142
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 NVIDIA RTX A6000

Essentials

Architecture Ada Lovelace Ampere
Code name AD102 GA102
Launch date 20 Sep 2022 5 Oct 2020
Place in performance rating 13 100
Launch price (MSRP) $4649

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2520 MHz 1860 MHz
Core clock speed 2235 MHz 1455 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 1,290 GFLOPS (1:64) 1250 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1) 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 82.58 TFLOPS 40.00 TFLOPS
Pipelines 16384 10752
Pixel fill rate 443.5 GPixel/s 208.3 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 1,290 GTexel/s 625.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 450 Watt 300 Watt
Transistor count 76300 million 28300 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 4x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Triple-slot Dual-slot
Height 61 mm, 2.4 inches
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 304 mm, 12 inches 267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 850 Watt 700 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 16-pin 8-pin EPS
Width 137 mm, 5.4 inches 112 mm (4.4 inches)

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.2
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 6.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 48 GB
Memory bandwidth 1,008 GB/s 768 GB/s
Memory bus width 384 bit 384 bit
Memory clock speed 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Memory type GDDR6X GDDR6