NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 640 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 34.92 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 1,117 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3327 vs 526
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 232
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11181 vs 2100
- 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.134 vs 5.617
- 8.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.164 vs 16.137
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4662 vs 899
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1255
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2037
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4662 vs 899
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1255
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2037
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 13 December 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 640 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops vs 245.76 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 vs 526 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 vs 232 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 vs 2100 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 vs 5.617 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 vs 16.137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 vs 899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2037 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 vs 899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2037 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA Quadro 600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 | 526 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 | 232 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | 2100 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | 5.617 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | 16.137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 2037 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 2037 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 185.752 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.526 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.023 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA Quadro 600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GP107 | GF108 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 13 December 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | $179 |
| Place in performance rating | 556 | 1471 |
| Price now | $169.99 | $299 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | 2.80 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | 640 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 245.76 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | 10.24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |

