AMD A10-7800 versus AMD A10-6800K
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-7800 et AMD A10-6800K pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Périphériques. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-7800
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 32 nm SOI
- Environ 33% plus de la cache L1, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L1 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3215 versus 3199
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.821 versus 10.547
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.668 versus 0.604
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.524 versus 3.801
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1750 versus 1267
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1750 versus 1267
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 32 nm SOI |
Cache L1 | 256 KB versus 192 KB |
Référence | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3215 versus 3199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.821 versus 10.547 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.668 versus 0.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.524 versus 3.801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1750 versus 1267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1750 versus 1267 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-6800K
- Processeur est ouvert; un multiplicateur ouvert soutien le overclocking plus facile
- Environ 13% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.4 GHz versus 3.9 GHz
- Environ 4% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 74°C versus 71.30°C
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1596 versus 1458
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 542 versus 476
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1494 versus 1390
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.893 versus 4.473
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.209 versus 0.18
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4136 versus 1508
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4604 versus 3316
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4136 versus 1508
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4604 versus 3316
Caractéristiques | |
Ouvert | Ouvert versus barré |
Fréquence maximale | 4.4 GHz versus 3.9 GHz |
Température de noyau maximale | 74°C versus 71.30°C |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1596 versus 1458 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 542 versus 476 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1494 versus 1390 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.893 versus 4.473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.209 versus 0.18 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4136 versus 1508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4604 versus 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4136 versus 1508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4604 versus 3316 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10-7800
CPU 2: AMD A10-6800K
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A10-7800 | AMD A10-6800K |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1458 | 1596 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3215 | 3199 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 476 | 542 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1390 | 1494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.473 | 4.893 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.821 | 10.547 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.18 | 0.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.668 | 0.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.524 | 3.801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1750 | 1267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1508 | 4136 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 | 4604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1750 | 1267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1508 | 4136 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 | 4604 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A10-7800 | AMD A10-6800K | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
OPN PIB | AD7800YBJABOX | AD680KWOHLBOX |
OPN Tray | AD7800YBI44JA | AD680KWOA44HL |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2076 | 1514 |
Série | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Nom de code de l’architecture | Richland | |
Date de sortie | 4 June 2013 | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $142 | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
Compute Cores | 12 | |
Cache L1 | 256 KB | 192 KB |
Cache L2 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 32 nm SOI |
Température de noyau maximale | 71.30°C | 74°C |
Fréquence maximale | 3.9 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Ouvert | ||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Compte de transistor | 1303 Million | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 720 MHz | 844 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 512 | 384 |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8670D |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Nombre de pipelines | 384 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
Prise courants soutenu | FM2+ | FM2 |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 2.0 |