AMD A10-7860K versus AMD A8-9600
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-7860K et AMD A8-9600 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Périphériques. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-7860K
- Environ 18% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4 GHz versus 3.4 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 516 versus 475
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1510 versus 1409
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.11 versus 3.637
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 245.697 versus 129.751
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.362 versus 1.041
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.192 versus 20.198
- 17.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 89.484 versus 5.073
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 4 GHz versus 3.4 GHz |
Cache L2 | 4 MB versus 2 MB |
Référence | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 516 versus 475 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1510 versus 1409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.11 versus 3.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 245.697 versus 129.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.362 versus 1.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.192 versus 20.198 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.484 versus 5.073 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-9600
- Environ 26% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 90°C versus 71.30°C
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3312 versus 3282
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2015 versus 1721
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3006 versus 1671
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9707 versus 6023
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2015 versus 1721
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3006 versus 1671
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9707 versus 6023
Caractéristiques | |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C versus 71.30°C |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1489 versus 1488 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3312 versus 3282 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2015 versus 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3006 versus 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9707 versus 6023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2015 versus 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3006 versus 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9707 versus 6023 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10-7860K
CPU 2: AMD A8-9600
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A10-7860K | AMD A8-9600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1488 | 1489 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3282 | 3312 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 516 | 475 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1510 | 1409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.11 | 3.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 245.697 | 129.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.362 | 1.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.192 | 20.198 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.484 | 5.073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1721 | 2015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 3006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6023 | 9707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1721 | 2015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 3006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6023 | 9707 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A10-7860K | AMD A8-9600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
OPN PIB | AD786KYBJABOX | AD9600AGABBOX |
OPN Tray | AD786KYBI44JC | AD9600AGM44AB |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1075 | 1082 |
Série | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Nom de code de l’architecture | Bristol Ridge | |
Date de sortie | 27 July 2017 | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $78 | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Prix maintenant | $64.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 22.69 | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Compute Cores | 12 | 10 |
Cache L1 | 256 KB | |
Cache L2 | 4 MB | 2 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 71.30°C | 90°C |
Fréquence maximale | 4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | 6 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | |
Ouvert | ||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Compte de transistor | 1178 million | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 757 MHz | 900 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 512 | 6 |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Radeon R7 Series |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | 45/65 Watt |
Prise courants soutenu | FM2+ | AM4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Périphériques |
||
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 8 | |
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 x8 |