AMD A10-7860K vs AMD A8-9600
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A10-7860K und AMD A8-9600 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Peripherien. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-7860K
- Etwa 18% höhere Taktfrequenz: 4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 516 vs 475
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1510 vs 1409
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.11 vs 3.637
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 245.697 vs 129.751
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.362 vs 1.041
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.192 vs 20.198
- 17.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 89.484 vs 5.073
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1488 vs 1486 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 516 vs 475 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1510 vs 1409 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.11 vs 3.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 245.697 vs 129.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.362 vs 1.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.192 vs 20.198 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.484 vs 5.073 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A8-9600
- Etwa 26% höhere Kerntemperatur: 90°C vs 71.30°C
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3298 vs 3271
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2015 vs 1721
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3006 vs 1671
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9707 vs 6023
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2015 vs 1721
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3006 vs 1671
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9707 vs 6023
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C vs 71.30°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3298 vs 3271 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2015 vs 1721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3006 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9707 vs 6023 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2015 vs 1721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3006 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9707 vs 6023 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A10-7860K
CPU 2: AMD A8-9600
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A10-7860K | AMD A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1488 | 1486 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3271 | 3298 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 516 | 475 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1510 | 1409 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.11 | 3.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 245.697 | 129.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.362 | 1.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.192 | 20.198 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.484 | 5.073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1721 | 2015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 3006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6023 | 9707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1721 | 2015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 3006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6023 | 9707 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD A10-7860K | AMD A8-9600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| OPN PIB | AD786KYBJABOX | AD9600AGABBOX |
| OPN Tray | AD786KYBI44JC | AD9600AGM44AB |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1073 | 1079 |
| Serie | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architektur Codename | Bristol Ridge | |
| Startdatum | 27 July 2017 | |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $78 | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $64.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 22.69 | |
Leistung |
||
| Basistaktfrequenz | 3.6 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 12 | 10 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 71.30°C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | |
| Freigegeben | ||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1178 million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Unterstützte Speicherfrequenz | 2133 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 757 MHz | 900 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 512 | 6 |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Radeon R7 Series |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | 45/65 Watt |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FM2+ | AM4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 8 | |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 x8 | |
