AMD A6-7310 versus AMD A4-4300M
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A6-7310 et AMD A4-4300M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A6-7310
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 32 nm
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1724 versus 1000
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 712 versus 482
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.506 versus 0.74
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3.068 versus 1.13
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.128 versus 0.035
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.012 versus 5.292
- 19.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 21.75 versus 1.108
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 671 versus 307
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4016 versus 3568
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 671 versus 307
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4016 versus 3568
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 May 2015 versus 30 June 2012 |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 32 nm |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1724 versus 1000 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 712 versus 482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.506 versus 0.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3.068 versus 1.13 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.128 versus 0.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.012 versus 5.292 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.75 versus 1.108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 671 versus 307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4016 versus 3568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 671 versus 307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4016 versus 3568 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A4-4300M
- Environ 25% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3 GHz versus 2.4 GHz
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1014 versus 775
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 313 versus 247
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1699 versus 750
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1699 versus 750
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3 GHz versus 2.4 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1014 versus 775 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 313 versus 247 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1699 versus 750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1699 versus 750 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A6-7310
CPU 2: AMD A4-4300M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD A6-7310 | AMD A4-4300M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 775 | 1014 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1724 | 1000 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 247 | 313 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 712 | 482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.506 | 0.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3.068 | 1.13 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.128 | 0.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.012 | 5.292 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.75 | 1.108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 671 | 307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 750 | 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4016 | 3568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 671 | 307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 750 | 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4016 | 3568 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD A6-7310 | AMD A4-4300M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Carrizo-L | Trinity |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Date de sortie | 7 May 2015 | 30 June 2012 |
| OPN Tray | AM7310JBY44JB | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2338 | 2341 |
| Série | AMD A6-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A-Series |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2 GHz | |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 1024 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | |
| Compte de transistor | 930 Million | 1303 Million |
| Ouvert | ||
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 96 KB | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L | |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 800 MHz | |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | FP4, FT3b | FS1r2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD A6-7310 avec des autres
AMDA6-7310 vs
AMDTurion 64 X2 TL-64
AMDA6-7310 vs
IntelCore i3-2332M
AMDA6-7310 vs
IntelCore i7-3555LE
AMDA6-7310 vs
AMDA4-4300M
AMDA6-7310 vs
IntelAtom E3827
AMDA6-7310 vs
AMDPRO A12-8830B
