AMD A6-9225 versus AMD A9-9420
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A6-9225 et AMD A9-9420 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A6-9225
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1522 versus 1062
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1522 versus 1062
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4199 versus 2951
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4199 versus 2951
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1522 versus 1062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1522 versus 1062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4199 versus 2951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4199 versus 2951 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A9-9420
- Environ 38% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.6 GHz versus 2.6 GHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1313 versus 1161
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1516 versus 1338
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 799 versus 754
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 799 versus 754
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.252 versus 1.391
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz versus 2.6 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1313 versus 1161 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1516 versus 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 799 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 799 versus 754 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.252 versus 1.391 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A6-9225
CPU 2: AMD A9-9420
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A6-9225 | AMD A9-9420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1161 | 1313 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1338 | 1516 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 | 799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | 799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1522 | 1062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1522 | 1062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4199 | 2951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4199 | 2951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.391 | 2.252 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1907 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2847 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3.197 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.108 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.309 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.538 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A6-9225 | AMD A9-9420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
Date de sortie | Q2 2018 | 1 June 2016 |
OPN Tray | AM9225AYN23AC | AM9420AYN23AC |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1660 | 2206 |
Série | AMD A6-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops |
Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Nom de code de l’architecture | Stoney Ridge | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
Compute Cores | 5 | 5 |
Cache L2 | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 90°C |
Fréquence maximale | 2.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
Number of GPU cores | 3 | 3 |
Ouvert | ||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Taille de dé | 124.5 mm | |
Nombre de fils | 2 | |
Compte de transistor | 1200 Million | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 686 MHz | 847 MHz |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 3 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | 10-15 Watt |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |