AMD A8-3870K versus AMD A8-3850
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A8-3870K et AMD A8-3850 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Compatibilité, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-3870K
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Processeur est ouvert; un multiplicateur ouvert soutien le overclocking plus facile
- Environ 3% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3 GHz versus 2.9 GHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 373 versus 361
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1172 versus 1136
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | December 2011 versus June 2011 |
Ouvert | Ouvert versus barré |
Fréquence maximale | 3 GHz versus 2.9 GHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 373 versus 361 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1172 versus 1136 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-3850
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2397 versus 2340
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.124 versus 2.914
- 22.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 211.23 versus 9.482
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.404 versus 0.191
- 26.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.601 versus 0.4
- 13.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 43.843 versus 3.344
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 953 versus 762
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1977 versus 1721
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 953 versus 762
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1977 versus 1721
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1216 versus 1213 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2397 versus 2340 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.124 versus 2.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 211.23 versus 9.482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.404 versus 0.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.601 versus 0.4 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.843 versus 3.344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 953 versus 762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1977 versus 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 953 versus 762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1977 versus 1721 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A8-3870K
CPU 2: AMD A8-3850
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A8-3870K | AMD A8-3850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1213 | 1216 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2340 | 2397 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 373 | 361 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1172 | 1136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.914 | 3.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.482 | 211.23 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.191 | 0.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.4 | 10.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.344 | 43.843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 762 | 953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | 1977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 762 | 953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | 1977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4691 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A8-3870K | AMD A8-3850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Llano | Llano |
Date de sortie | December 2011 | June 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2560 | 1567 |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Série | A-Series (Desktop) | |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Taille de dé | 228 mm | 228 mm |
Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
Cache L2 | 1024 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (per core) |
Processus de fabrication | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Fréquence maximale | 3 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Compte de transistor | 1178 million | 1178 million |
Ouvert | ||
Nombre de fils | 4 | |
Mémoire |
||
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibilité |
||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Prise courants soutenu | FM1 | FM1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |