AMD A8-3870K vs AMD A8-3850
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A8-3870K und AMD A8-3850 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Kompatibilität, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A8-3870K
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Monat(e) später
- Der Prozessor ist entsperrt, ein entsperrter Multiplikator ermöglicht eine einfachere Übertaktung
- Etwa 3% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 373 vs 361
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1172 vs 1136
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | December 2011 vs June 2011 |
Freigegeben | Freigegeben vs Gesperrt |
Maximale Frequenz | 3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 373 vs 361 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1172 vs 1136 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A8-3850
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2397 vs 2340
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.124 vs 2.914
- 22.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 211.23 vs 9.482
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.404 vs 0.191
- 26.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.601 vs 0.4
- 13.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 43.843 vs 3.344
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 953 vs 762
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1977 vs 1721
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 953 vs 762
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1977 vs 1721
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1216 vs 1213 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2397 vs 2340 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.124 vs 2.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 211.23 vs 9.482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.404 vs 0.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.601 vs 0.4 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.843 vs 3.344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 953 vs 762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1977 vs 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 953 vs 762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1977 vs 1721 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A8-3870K
CPU 2: AMD A8-3850
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A8-3870K | AMD A8-3850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1213 | 1216 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2340 | 2397 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 373 | 361 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1172 | 1136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.914 | 3.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.482 | 211.23 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.191 | 0.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.4 | 10.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.344 | 43.843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 762 | 953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | 1977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 762 | 953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | 1977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4691 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD A8-3870K | AMD A8-3850 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Llano | Llano |
Startdatum | December 2011 | June 2011 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2560 | 1567 |
Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Serie | A-Series (Desktop) | |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Matrizengröße | 228 mm | 228 mm |
L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (per core) |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Maximale Frequenz | 3 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1178 million | 1178 million |
Freigegeben | ||
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | |
Speicher |
||
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
Unterstützte Sockel | FM1 | FM1 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |