AMD A8-4500M versus AMD A8-3510MX
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A8-4500M et AMD A8-3510MX pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Mémoire. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-4500M
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.8 GHz versus 2.5 GHz
- Environ 29% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 919 versus 898
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1689 versus 1631
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 319 versus 290
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 850 versus 838
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.85 versus 2.202
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 versus 14 June 2011 |
Fréquence maximale | 2.8 GHz versus 2.5 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 919 versus 898 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1689 versus 1631 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 319 versus 290 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 850 versus 838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.85 versus 2.202 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-3510MX
- 2.7x plus de la cache L1, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L1 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7.959 versus 6.601
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.148 versus 0.141
- 25x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.301 versus 0.252
- 18.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 33.396 versus 1.772
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2995 versus 2944
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2995 versus 2944
Caractéristiques | |
Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) versus 192 KB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.959 versus 6.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.148 versus 0.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.301 versus 0.252 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.396 versus 1.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2995 versus 2944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2995 versus 2944 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A8-4500M
CPU 2: AMD A8-3510MX
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A8-4500M | AMD A8-3510MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 919 | 898 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1689 | 1631 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 319 | 290 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 850 | 838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.85 | 2.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.601 | 7.959 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.141 | 0.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.252 | 6.301 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.772 | 33.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 623 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2944 | 2995 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4413 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 623 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2944 | 2995 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4413 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A8-4500M | AMD A8-3510MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Trinity | Llano |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 | 14 June 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1995 | 2003 |
Série | AMD A-Series | AMD A-Series |
Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Taille de dé | 246 mm | 218 mm |
Cache L1 | 192 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
Cache L2 | 4096 KB | 4096 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Fréquence maximale | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Compte de transistor | 1303 Million | 1000 Million |
Compatibilité |
||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Prise courants soutenu | FS1r2 | FS1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies élevé |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Mémoire |
||
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 |