AMD A9-9420 versus Intel Core i3-5005U
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A9-9420 et Intel Core i3-5005U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Virtualization, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A9-9420
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 80% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.6 GHz versus 2 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1313 versus 1140
- 4.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1907 versus 452
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2847 versus 997
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 June 2016 versus 5 January 2015 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz versus 2 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB versus 512 KB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1313 versus 1140 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1907 versus 452 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2847 versus 997 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i3-5005U
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 17% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 105°C versus 90°C
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2016 versus 1516
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.765 versus 2.252
- 10.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 33.512 versus 3.197
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.212 versus 0.108
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.535 versus 0.309
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.741 versus 2.538
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 866 versus 799
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2531 versus 1062
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3998 versus 2951
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 866 versus 799
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2531 versus 1062
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3998 versus 2951
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C versus 90°C |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2016 versus 1516 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.765 versus 2.252 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 33.512 versus 3.197 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.212 versus 0.108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.535 versus 0.309 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.741 versus 2.538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 866 versus 799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2531 versus 1062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3998 versus 2951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 866 versus 799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2531 versus 1062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3998 versus 2951 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A9-9420
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-5005U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD A9-9420 | Intel Core i3-5005U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1313 | 1140 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1516 | 2016 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1907 | 452 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2847 | 997 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.252 | 4.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3.197 | 33.512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.108 | 0.212 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.309 | 1.535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.538 | 12.741 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 799 | 866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1062 | 2531 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2951 | 3998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 799 | 866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1062 | 2531 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2951 | 3998 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD A9-9420 | Intel Core i3-5005U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Stoney Ridge | Broadwell |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Date de sortie | 1 June 2016 | 5 January 2015 |
| OPN Tray | AM9420AYN23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2206 | 1918 |
| Série | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $275 | |
| Processor Number | i3-5005U | |
| Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Taille de dé | 124.5 mm | 82 mm |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 105°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 1200 Million | 1300 Million |
| Ouvert | ||
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
| Cache L3 | 3 MB | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 105 °C | |
Mémoire |
||
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L 1333/1600 LPDDR 1333 /1600 | |
Graphiques |
||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 847 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 3 | |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 5500 |
| Device ID | 0x1616 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 850 MHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 16 GB | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 40mm x 24mmx 1.3mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1168 | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 12 | |
| PCIe configurations | 4x1 2x4 | |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | N / A | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD A9-9420 avec des autres
AMDA9-9420 vs
AMDTurion II Ultra M640
AMDA9-9420 vs
AMDPhenom II X3 P840
AMDA9-9420 vs
IntelAtom x7-E3950
AMDA9-9420 vs
IntelCore i7-2610UE
AMDA9-9420 vs
IntelCore i5-4422E
AMDA9-9420 vs
AMDGX-424CC
