AMD A9-9430 versus Intel Core i5-3330
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A9-9430 et Intel Core i5-3330 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Interfaces de graphiques, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A9-9430
- Environ 109275% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3500 MHz versus 3.20 GHz
- 3.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 77 Watt
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.568 versus 3.047
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 142.793 versus 73.477
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.688 versus 0.362
- 9.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.424 versus 1.704
- 8.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.08 versus 4.579
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4616 versus 968
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4616 versus 968
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 3500 MHz versus 3.20 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 77 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.568 versus 3.047 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.793 versus 73.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.688 versus 0.362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.424 versus 1.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.08 versus 4.579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4616 versus 968 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4616 versus 968 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-3330
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 60% plus de la cache L1, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L1 pour l’accès facil plus tard
Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) versus 160 KB |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A9-9430
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3330
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A9-9430 | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.568 | 3.047 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.793 | 73.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.688 | 0.362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.424 | 1.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.08 | 4.579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 830 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1522 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4616 | 968 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 830 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1522 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4616 | 968 |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1718 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 4105 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 656 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2156 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A9-9430 | Intel Core i5-3330 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Stoney Ridge | Ivy Bridge |
Family | AMD A9-Series | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1382 | 2612 |
Processor Number | A9-9430 | i5-3330 |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Date de sortie | September 2012 | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $360 | |
Prix maintenant | $309.99 | |
Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 5.64 | |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 3200 MHz | 3.00 GHz |
Cache L1 | 160 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
Cache L2 | 1 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Fréquence maximale | 3500 MHz | 3.20 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 4 |
Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
Taille de dé | 133 mm | |
Cache L3 | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 67 °C | |
Température de noyau maximale | 67.4°C | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 2 |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2400 | DDR3 1333/1600 |
Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
Graphiques |
||
Graphiques du processeur | Radeon R5 series | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Device ID | 0x152 | |
Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.05 GHz | |
Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Package Size | micro-BGA | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Prise courants soutenu | BGA (FT4) | FCLGA1155 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 77 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Thermal Solution | 2011D | |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | |
Intel 64 | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) |