AMD Athlon X4 750K versus AMD PRO A8-9600
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD Athlon X4 750K et AMD PRO A8-9600 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Athlon X4 750K
- Environ 18% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4 GHz versus 3.4 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
Fréquence maximale | 4 GHz versus 3.4 GHz |
Cache L2 | 4 MB versus 2 MB |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A8-9600
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 32 nm
- Environ 54% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1509 versus 1467
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3333 versus 2883
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 17.191 versus 4.272
- 21x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 269.509 versus 12.842
- 6.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.523 versus 0.223
- 47.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.695 versus 0.584
- 26.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.399 versus 3.192
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1509 versus 1467 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3333 versus 2883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.191 versus 4.272 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 269.509 versus 12.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.523 versus 0.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.695 versus 0.584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.399 versus 3.192 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD Athlon X4 750K
CPU 2: AMD PRO A8-9600
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Athlon X4 750K | AMD PRO A8-9600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1467 | 1509 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2883 | 3333 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 492 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1301 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.272 | 17.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12.842 | 269.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.223 | 1.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.584 | 27.695 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.192 | 84.399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1299 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1377 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1299 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1377 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4551 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Athlon X4 750K | AMD PRO A8-9600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Family | AMD Athlon Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
OPN PIB | AD750KWOHJBOX | |
OPN Tray | AD750KWOA44HJ | AD960BAGM44AB |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2821 | 999 |
Série | AMD Athlon X4 | AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Desktops |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Cache L2 | 4 MB | 2 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Fréquence maximale | 4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | |
Ouvert | ||
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Compatibilité |
||
Prise courants soutenu | FM2 | AM4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 65 Watt |
Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 900 MHz | |
Graphiques du processeur | R7 | |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD Secure technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
PowerTune | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |