AMD E1-2100 versus AMD E1-2500
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD E1-2100 et AMD E1-2500 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E1-2100
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 9 Watt versus 15 Watt
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1098 versus 889
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1098 versus 889
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt versus 15 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1098 versus 889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1098 versus 889 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E1-2500
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 450 versus 323
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 590 versus 407
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 149 versus 109
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 261 versus 183
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.416 versus 0.547
- 39.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 62.654 versus 1.584
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.17 versus 0.04
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.002 versus 3.862
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.81 versus 9.251
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 390 versus 311
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2470 versus 1840
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 390 versus 311
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2470 versus 1840
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 450 versus 323 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 590 versus 407 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 149 versus 109 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 261 versus 183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.416 versus 0.547 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 62.654 versus 1.584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.17 versus 0.04 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.002 versus 3.862 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.81 versus 9.251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 390 versus 311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2470 versus 1840 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 390 versus 311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2470 versus 1840 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD E1-2100
CPU 2: AMD E1-2500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD E1-2100 | AMD E1-2500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 323 | 450 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 407 | 590 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 109 | 149 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 183 | 261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.547 | 2.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.584 | 62.654 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.04 | 0.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.862 | 5.002 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.251 | 12.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 311 | 390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1098 | 889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1840 | 2470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 311 | 390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1098 | 889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1840 | 2470 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD E1-2100 | AMD E1-2500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Kabini | Kabini |
| Family | AMD E-Series Processors | AMD E-Series Processors |
| Date de sortie | 23 May 2013 | 23 May 2013 |
| OPN Tray | EM2100CJ23HM | EM2500BJ23HM |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2875 | 2665 |
| Série | AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops | AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | 246 mm |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 90 °C | 90 °C |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 1178 million | 1178 million |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 1 |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | Not Listed | Not Listed |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon HD 8210 | AMD Radeon HD 8240 |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Prise courants soutenu | FT3 | FT3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt | 15 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD E1-2100 avec des autres
AMDE1-2100 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T6570
AMDE1-2100 vs
AMDA4-3310MX
AMDE1-2100 vs
AMDA6-3400M
AMDE1-2100 vs
AMDA4-3305M
AMDE1-2100 vs
IntelCeleron 1047UE
AMDE1-2100 vs
IntelAtom C2558
