AMD E1-6010 versus Intel Core i3-4025U
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD E1-6010 et Intel Core i3-4025U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Qualité des images graphiques, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E1-6010
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 15 Watt
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 62.055 versus 21.304
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.196 versus 0.175
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.689 versus 1.135
Caractéristiques | |
Cache L2 | 1 MB versus 512 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 62.055 versus 21.304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.196 versus 0.175 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.689 versus 1.135 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i3-4025U
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1082 versus 427
- 3.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1968 versus 538
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 381 versus 142
- 3.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 911 versus 250
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.049 versus 2.155
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.131 versus 11.178
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 738 versus 377
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1114 versus 877
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2584 versus 2018
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 738 versus 377
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1114 versus 877
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2584 versus 2018
Caractéristiques | |
Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1082 versus 427 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1968 versus 538 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 381 versus 142 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 911 versus 250 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.049 versus 2.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.131 versus 11.178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 738 versus 377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1114 versus 877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2584 versus 2018 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 738 versus 377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1114 versus 877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2584 versus 2018 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD E1-6010
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-4025U
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD E1-6010 | Intel Core i3-4025U |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 427 | 1082 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 538 | 1968 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 142 | 381 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 250 | 911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.155 | 4.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 62.055 | 21.304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.196 | 0.175 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.689 | 1.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 11.178 | 12.131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 377 | 738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 877 | 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2018 | 2584 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 377 | 738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 877 | 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2018 | 2584 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD E1-6010 | Intel Core i3-4025U | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Beema | Haswell |
Family | AMD E-Series Processors | |
Date de sortie | 29 April 2014 | 14 April 2014 |
OPN Tray | EM6010IUJ23JB | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2768 | 2456 |
Série | AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors |
Segment vertical | Laptop | Mobile |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $275 | |
Processor Number | i3-4025U | |
Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 1.35 GHz | 1.90 GHz |
Cache L2 | 1 MB | 512 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
Ouvert | ||
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
Cache L3 | 3 MB | |
Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | |
Fréquence maximale | 1.9 GHz | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 2 |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L-1333 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB | |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Device ID | 0xA16 | |
Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 950 MHz | |
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 950 MHz | |
Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 2 GB | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
eDP | ||
Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
Prise courants soutenu | FT3b | FCBGA1168 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm | |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
IDE integré | ||
LAN integré | ||
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 10 | |
Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | |
Nombre des ports USB | 4 | |
Soutien de PCI | ||
PCIe configurations | 4x1, 1x4, 1x2 | |
Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | |
UART | ||
Révision USB | 3.0 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
System Image Stability | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
HD Audio | ||
Idle States | ||
Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Technologie Intel® Active Management (AMT) | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Matrix Storage | ||
Smart Connect | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3200x2000@60Hz | |
Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 3200x2000@60Hz | |
Résolution maximale sur VGA | N / A | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) |