AMD E2-7110 versus AMD A10-7300
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD E2-7110 et AMD A10-7300 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E2-7110
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.23 versus 0.897
- 9.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 101.163 versus 10.705
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.354 versus 0.124
- 16.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.252 versus 0.375
- 8.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.962 versus 2.351
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3049 versus 2948
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3049 versus 2948
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 May 2015 versus 4 June 2014 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.23 versus 0.897 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 101.163 versus 10.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.354 versus 0.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.252 versus 0.375 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.962 versus 2.351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 versus 2948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 versus 2948 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-7300
- Environ 78% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.2 GHz versus 1.8 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 863 versus 611
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1742 versus 1515
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 303 versus 205
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 794 versus 664
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 994 versus 577
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1904 versus 1098
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 994 versus 577
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1904 versus 1098
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.2 GHz versus 1.8 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB versus 2 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 863 versus 611 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1742 versus 1515 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 303 versus 205 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 794 versus 664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 994 versus 577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1904 versus 1098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 994 versus 577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1904 versus 1098 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD E2-7110
CPU 2: AMD A10-7300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD E2-7110 | AMD A10-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 611 | 863 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1515 | 1742 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 205 | 303 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 664 | 794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.23 | 0.897 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 101.163 | 10.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.354 | 0.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.252 | 0.375 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.962 | 2.351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 577 | 994 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1098 | 1904 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 | 2948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 577 | 994 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1098 | 1904 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 | 2948 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD E2-7110 | AMD A10-7300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Carrizo-L | Kaveri |
| Family | AMD E-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Date de sortie | 7 May 2015 | 4 June 2014 |
| OPN Tray | EM7110JBY44JB | AM7300ECH44JA |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2314 | 2315 |
| Série | AMD E2-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A10-Series APU for Laptops |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 1.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 930 Million | 2410 Million |
| Ouvert | ||
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| Taille de dé | 245 mm | |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L | Not Listed |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 600 MHz | 553 MHz |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 6 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | FP4, FT3b | FP3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 20 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD E2-7110 avec des autres
AMDE2-7110 vs
AMDTurion X2 Ultra ZM-84
AMDE2-7110 vs
IntelCore i3-2332M
AMDE2-7110 vs
IntelCore i7-3555LE
AMDE2-7110 vs
IntelAtom E3827
AMDE2-7110 vs
AMDA10-7300
AMDE2-7110 vs
AMDA9-9420e
