AMD E2-7110 vs AMD A10-7300
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD E2-7110 und AMD A10-7300 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD E2-7110
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.23 vs 0.897
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 101.163 vs 10.705
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.354 vs 0.124
- 16.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.252 vs 0.375
- 8.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.962 vs 2.351
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3049 vs 2948
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3049 vs 2948
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 May 2015 vs 4 June 2014 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.23 vs 0.897 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 101.163 vs 10.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.354 vs 0.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.252 vs 0.375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.962 vs 2.351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 vs 2948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 vs 2948 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-7300
- Etwa 78% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- 3.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 20 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 863 vs 611
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 1742 vs 1516
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 303 vs 205
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 794 vs 664
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 994 vs 577
- Etwa 73% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1904 vs 1098
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 994 vs 577
- Etwa 73% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1904 vs 1098
Spezifikationen | |
Maximale Frequenz | 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
L2 Cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 863 vs 611 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1742 vs 1516 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 303 vs 205 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 794 vs 664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 994 vs 577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1904 vs 1098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 994 vs 577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1904 vs 1098 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD E2-7110
CPU 2: AMD A10-7300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD E2-7110 | AMD A10-7300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 611 | 863 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1516 | 1742 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 205 | 303 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 664 | 794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.23 | 0.897 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 101.163 | 10.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.354 | 0.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.252 | 0.375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.962 | 2.351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 577 | 994 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1098 | 1904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 | 2948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 577 | 994 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1098 | 1904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 | 2948 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD E2-7110 | AMD A10-7300 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Carrizo-L | Kaveri |
Family | AMD E-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
Startdatum | 7 May 2015 | 4 June 2014 |
OPN Tray | EM7110JBY44JB | AM7300ECH44JA |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2320 | 2321 |
Serie | AMD E2-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A10-Series APU for Laptops |
Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
Maximale Frequenz | 1.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 930 Million | 2410 Million |
Freigegeben | ||
Compute Cores | 10 | |
Matrizengröße | 245 mm | |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale Speicherkanäle | 1 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L | Not Listed |
Grafik |
||
Enduro | ||
Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 600 MHz | 553 MHz |
Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics |
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
iGPU Kernzahl | 6 | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
Unterstützte Sockel | FP4, FT3b | FP3 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 20 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
VirusProtect | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |