AMD PRO A12-9800E versus Intel Core i5-8400
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD PRO A12-9800E et Intel Core i5-8400 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Qualité des images graphiques, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A12-9800E
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 86% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 65 Watt
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.25 versus 5.68
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 242.145 versus 73.097
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.423 versus 0.752
- 7.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.397 versus 3.767
- 9.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.209 versus 10.333
| Caractéristiques | |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 1 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.25 versus 5.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 242.145 versus 73.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.423 versus 0.752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.397 versus 3.767 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.209 versus 10.333 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-8400
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 6 versus 4
- Environ 5% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.00 GHz versus 3.8 GHz
- Environ 11% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 100°C versus 90°C
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2380 versus 1508
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 9235 versus 3175
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1826 versus 922
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3900 versus 1067
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6201 versus 3472
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1826 versus 922
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3900 versus 1067
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6201 versus 3472
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 January 2017 versus 3 October 2016 |
| Nombre de noyaux | 6 versus 4 |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.00 GHz versus 3.8 GHz |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C versus 90°C |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2380 versus 1508 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 9235 versus 3175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1826 versus 922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3900 versus 1067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6201 versus 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1826 versus 922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3900 versus 1067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6201 versus 3472 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD PRO A12-9800E
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-8400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD PRO A12-9800E | Intel Core i5-8400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1508 | 2380 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3175 | 9235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.25 | 5.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 242.145 | 73.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.423 | 0.752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.397 | 3.767 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.209 | 10.333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 922 | 1826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1067 | 3900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3472 | 6201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 922 | 1826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1067 | 3900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3472 | 6201 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1048 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4580 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3633 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD PRO A12-9800E | Intel Core i5-8400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 | 5 January 2017 |
| OPN Tray | AD980BAHM44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1131 | 1142 |
| Série | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Coffee Lake | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $190 | |
| Prix maintenant | $259 | |
| Processor Number | i5-8400 | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.28 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.8 GHz | 4.00 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 6 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Ouvert | ||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB | |
| Cache L3 | 9 MB | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Nombre de fils | 6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2666 | |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 900 MHz | |
| Graphiques du processeur | R7 | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x3E92 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 64 GB | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | AM4 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD PRO A12-9800E avec des autres
AMDPRO A12-9800E vs
IntelCore i5-8400
AMDPRO A12-9800E vs
IntelCore i5-9400T
AMDPRO A12-9800E vs
AMDRyzen 5 3600
AMDPRO A12-9800E vs
AMDAthlon Gold PRO 3150GE
AMDPRO A12-9800E vs
IntelPentium Gold G6505T
AMDPRO A12-9800E vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R2544
