AMD PRO A8-9600 versus Intel Core i7-4790
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD PRO A8-9600 et Intel Core i7-4790 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Qualité des images graphiques, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A8-9600
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 90°C versus 72.72°C
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 29% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 84 Watt
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 17.191 versus 5.169
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 269.509 versus 89.044
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.523 versus 0.65
- 10.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.695 versus 2.582
- 13.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.399 versus 6.435
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1299 versus 1245
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4551 versus 3807
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1299 versus 1245
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4551 versus 3807
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 versus 1 April 2014 |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C versus 72.72°C |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 1 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 84 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.191 versus 5.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 269.509 versus 89.044 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.523 versus 0.65 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.695 versus 2.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.399 versus 6.435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1299 versus 1245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4551 versus 3807 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1299 versus 1245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4551 versus 3807 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-4790
- Environ 18% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.00 GHz versus 3.4 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2229 versus 1509
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 7267 versus 3333
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2226 versus 1377
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2226 versus 1377
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.00 GHz versus 3.4 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2229 versus 1509 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 7267 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2226 versus 1377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2226 versus 1377 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD PRO A8-9600
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4790
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD PRO A8-9600 | Intel Core i7-4790 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1509 | 2229 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3333 | 7267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.191 | 5.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 269.509 | 89.044 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.523 | 0.65 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.695 | 2.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.399 | 6.435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1299 | 1245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1377 | 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4551 | 3807 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1299 | 1245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1377 | 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4551 | 3807 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 943 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3461 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2429 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD PRO A8-9600 | Intel Core i7-4790 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 | 1 April 2014 |
| OPN Tray | AD960BAGM44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 999 | 1623 |
| Série | AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Desktops | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Haswell | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $303 | |
| Prix maintenant | $278.99 | |
| Processor Number | i7-4790 | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.55 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 72.72°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz | 4.00 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Ouvert | ||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Taille de dé | 177 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB | |
| Cache L3 | 8 MB | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Nombre de fils | 8 | |
| Compte de transistor | 1400 Million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 900 MHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Graphiques du processeur | R7 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x412 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 2 GB | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
| Prise courants soutenu | AM4 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013D | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD PRO A8-9600 avec des autres
AMDPRO A8-9600 vs
AMDA12-9800
AMDPRO A8-9600 vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2600
AMDPRO A8-9600 vs
AMDPRO A10-8750B
AMDPRO A8-9600 vs
IntelPentium G2140
AMDPRO A8-9600 vs
IntelPentium Gold G6600
AMDPRO A8-9600 vs
IntelPentium Gold G7400T
