AMD Pro A12-8800B versus AMD FX-7600P
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD Pro A12-8800B et AMD FX-7600P pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Pro A12-8800B
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1315 versus 1265
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.844 versus 3.954
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1613 versus 709
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 versus 1932
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1613 versus 709
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 versus 1932
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2015 versus 4 June 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1315 versus 1265 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.844 versus 3.954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1613 versus 709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 versus 1932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1613 versus 709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 versus 1932 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FX-7600P
- Environ 6% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.6 GHz versus 3.4 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2611 versus 2580
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 396 versus 321
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1154 versus 747
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 245.917 versus 207.144
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.165 versus 0.105
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.028 versus 20.617
- 38.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 81.567 versus 2.135
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz versus 3.4 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB versus 2 MB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2611 versus 2580 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 396 versus 321 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1154 versus 747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 245.917 versus 207.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.165 versus 0.105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.028 versus 20.617 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.567 versus 2.135 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD Pro A12-8800B
CPU 2: AMD FX-7600P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Pro A12-8800B | AMD FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1315 | 1265 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2580 | 2611 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 321 | 396 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 747 | 1154 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.844 | 3.954 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 207.144 | 245.917 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.105 | 0.165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.617 | 25.028 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.135 | 81.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1266 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1613 | 709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 1932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1266 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1613 | 709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 1932 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Pro A12-8800B | AMD FX-7600P | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Carrizo | Kaveri |
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD FX-Series Processors |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2015 | 4 June 2014 |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1597 | 1588 |
| Série | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Laptops | AMD FX-Series Processors for Laptops |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
| OPN Tray | FM760PDGH44JA | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 12 | 12 |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 3100 Million | 2410 Million |
| Ouvert | ||
| Taille de dé | 245 mm | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105 °C | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 / DDR3L-2133 | DDR3 |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 800 MHz | 686 MHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 512 | 8 |
| Nombre de pipelines | 512 | |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | FP4 | FP3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD Pro A12-8800B avec des autres
AMDPro A12-8800B vs
IntelCore i5-4402E
AMDPro A12-8800B vs
AMDA10-9600P
AMDPro A12-8800B vs
AMDRyzen 7 3750H
AMDPro A12-8800B vs
IntelCeleron G3900E
AMDPro A12-8800B vs
IntelXeon E3-1284L v3
AMDPro A12-8800B vs
AMDRyzen 5 3580U
