AMD A10-9600P versus AMD Pro A12-8800B
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-9600P et AMD Pro A12-8800B pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-9600P
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 357 versus 321
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1003 versus 747
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.147 versus 0.105
- 23.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 51.119 versus 2.135
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1657 versus 1613
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5281 versus 3336
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1657 versus 1613
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5281 versus 3336
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 June 2016 versus 3 June 2015 |
Référence | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 versus 321 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1003 versus 747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.147 versus 0.105 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.119 versus 2.135 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1657 versus 1613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5281 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1657 versus 1613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5281 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Pro A12-8800B
- Environ 3% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.4 GHz versus 3.3 GHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1315 versus 1146
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2580 versus 2335
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.844 versus 2.935
- 39.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 207.144 versus 5.264
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.617 versus 15.767
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1266 versus 1047
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1266 versus 1047
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz versus 3.3 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1315 versus 1146 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2580 versus 2335 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.844 versus 2.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 207.144 versus 5.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.617 versus 15.767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1266 versus 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1266 versus 1047 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10-9600P
CPU 2: AMD Pro A12-8800B
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A10-9600P | AMD Pro A12-8800B |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1146 | 1315 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2335 | 2580 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 | 321 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1003 | 747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.935 | 14.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.264 | 207.144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.147 | 0.105 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.767 | 20.617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.119 | 2.135 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | 1266 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1657 | 1613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5281 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | 1266 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1657 | 1613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5281 | 3336 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A10-9600P | AMD Pro A12-8800B | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Bristol Ridge | Carrizo |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
Date de sortie | 1 June 2016 | 3 June 2015 |
OPN Tray | AM960PADY44AB | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1670 | 1661 |
Série | AMD A10-Series APU for Laptops | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Laptops |
Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Taille de dé | 250 mm | |
Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | 8 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Compte de transistor | 3100 Million | 3100 Million |
Ouvert | ||
Compute Cores | 12 | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | DDR3 / DDR3L-2133 |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 720 MHz | 800 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 6 | 512 |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Nombre de pipelines | 512 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | |
Prise courants soutenu | FP4 | FP4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 8 | |
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
AMD Secure technology | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
RAID | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |