AMD Pro A12-8800B vs AMD FX-7600P
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Pro A12-8800B und AMD FX-7600P Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Pro A12-8800B
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 0 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- 2.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1354 vs 1238
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2673 vs 2557
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.844 vs 3.954
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1613 vs 709
- Etwa 73% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 1932
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1613 vs 709
- Etwa 73% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 1932
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 3 June 2015 vs 4 June 2014 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1354 vs 1238 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2673 vs 2557 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.844 vs 3.954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1613 vs 709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 1932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1613 vs 709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 1932 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FX-7600P
- Etwa 6% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 396 vs 321
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1154 vs 747
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 245.917 vs 207.144
- Etwa 57% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.165 vs 0.105
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.028 vs 20.617
- 38.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 81.567 vs 2.135
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 396 vs 321 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1154 vs 747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 245.917 vs 207.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.165 vs 0.105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.028 vs 20.617 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.567 vs 2.135 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD Pro A12-8800B
CPU 2: AMD FX-7600P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Pro A12-8800B | AMD FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1354 | 1238 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2673 | 2557 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 321 | 396 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 747 | 1154 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.844 | 3.954 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 207.144 | 245.917 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.105 | 0.165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.617 | 25.028 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.135 | 81.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1266 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1613 | 709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 1932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1266 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1613 | 709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 1932 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Pro A12-8800B | AMD FX-7600P | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Carrizo | Kaveri |
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD FX-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | 3 June 2015 | 4 June 2014 |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1662 | 1663 |
| Serie | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Laptops | AMD FX-Series Processors for Laptops |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| OPN Tray | FM760PDGH44JA | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Basistaktfrequenz | 2.1 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 12 | 12 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | 2410 Million |
| Freigegeben | ||
| Matrizengröße | 245 mm | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105 °C | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Unterstützte Speicherfrequenz | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 / DDR3L-2133 | DDR3 |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 800 MHz | 686 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 512 | 8 |
| Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 512 | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | FP3 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD Pro A12-8800B mit anderen
AMDPro A12-8800B vs
AMDFX-7600P
AMDPro A12-8800B vs
AMDA10-9600P
AMDPro A12-8800B vs
IntelXeon E3-1284L v3
AMDPro A12-8800B vs
AMDRyzen 7 3780U
AMDPro A12-8800B vs
IntelCeleron J6413
AMDPro A12-8800B vs
IntelAtom x6413E
