AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE versus AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE et AMD Ryzen 3 2200G pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 86% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 387.896 versus 356.091
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.419 versus 2.276
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.816 versus 38.679
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 May 2018 versus 12 February 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2056 versus 2052 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.715 versus 28.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.896 versus 356.091 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.419 versus 2.276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.816 versus 38.679 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Environ 3% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.7 GHz versus 3.6 GHz
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 6767 versus 6398
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 136.274 versus 134.646
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.7 GHz versus 3.6 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6767 versus 6398 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 136.274 versus 134.646 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2056 | 2052 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6398 | 6767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.715 | 28.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.896 | 356.091 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.419 | 2.276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.816 | 38.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 134.646 | 136.274 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 852 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2736 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1678 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2802 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3768 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10990 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2802 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3768 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10990 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
Date de sortie | 10 May 2018 | 12 February 2018 |
OPN Tray | YD2200C6M4MFB | YD2200C5M4MFB |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 219 | 316 |
Série | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 3 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Nom de code de l’architecture | Zen | |
OPN PIB | YD2200C5FBBOX | |
Prix maintenant | $97.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 22.31 | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Cache L1 | 384 KB | 384 KB |
Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Cache L3 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm FinFET | 14 nm FinFET |
Température de noyau maximale | 95°C | 95°C |
Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Ouvert | ||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
Compte de transistor | 4500 Million | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | 2993 MHz |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | |
Graphiques |
||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 8 | 8 |
Graphiques du processeur | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP | n/a | 46-65 Watt |
Prise courants soutenu | AM4 | AM4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Not included | Wraith Stealth |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 x8 | 3.0 x8 |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD SenseMI | ||
The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
FreeSync | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |