AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE und AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 86% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 387.896 vs 356.091
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.419 vs 2.276
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.816 vs 38.679
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 10 May 2018 vs 12 February 2018 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2056 vs 2052 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.715 vs 28.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.896 vs 356.091 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.419 vs 2.276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.816 vs 38.679 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Etwa 3% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 6767 vs 6398
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 136.274 vs 134.646
Spezifikationen | |
Maximale Frequenz | 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6767 vs 6398 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 136.274 vs 134.646 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2056 | 2052 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6398 | 6767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.715 | 28.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.896 | 356.091 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.419 | 2.276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.816 | 38.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 134.646 | 136.274 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 852 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2736 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1678 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2802 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3768 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10990 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2802 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3768 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10990 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
Startdatum | 10 May 2018 | 12 February 2018 |
OPN Tray | YD2200C6M4MFB | YD2200C5M4MFB |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 219 | 316 |
Serie | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 3 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Architektur Codename | Zen | |
OPN PIB | YD2200C5FBBOX | |
Jetzt kaufen | $97.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 22.31 | |
Leistung |
||
Base frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
L1 Cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm FinFET | 14 nm FinFET |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 95°C | 95°C |
Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Freigegeben | ||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Matrizengröße | 246 mm | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4500 Million | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | 2993 MHz |
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | |
Grafik |
||
Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
iGPU Kernzahl | 8 | 8 |
Prozessorgrafiken | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
Configurable TDP | n/a | 46-65 Watt |
Unterstützte Sockel | AM4 | AM4 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Not included | Wraith Stealth |
Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Peripherien |
||
PCI Express Revision | 3.0 x8 | 3.0 x8 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
AMD SenseMI | ||
The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
FreeSync | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |