Intel Atom x5-Z8300 versus Intel Core i3-2370M
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Atom x5-Z8300 et Intel Core i3-2370M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Atom x5-Z8300
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 6% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 90°C versus 85C (PGA); 100C (BGA)
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 32 nm
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.82 versus 0.991
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C versus 85C (PGA); 100C (BGA) |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 32 nm |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.82 versus 0.991 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i3-2370M
- Environ 30% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.4 GHz versus 1.84 GHz
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1057 versus 456
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1374 versus 817
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 414 versus 157
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 882 versus 490
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 18.096 versus 8.772
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.135 versus 0.093
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.701 versus 0.339
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.623 versus 1.16
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.4 GHz versus 1.84 GHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1057 versus 456 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1374 versus 817 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 414 versus 157 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 882 versus 490 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.096 versus 8.772 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.135 versus 0.093 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.701 versus 0.339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.623 versus 1.16 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Atom x5-Z8300
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-2370M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Atom x5-Z8300 | Intel Core i3-2370M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 456 | 1057 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 817 | 1374 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 157 | 414 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 490 | 882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.82 | 0.991 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.772 | 18.096 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.093 | 0.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.339 | 0.701 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.16 | 1.623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 371 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 678 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1230 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 371 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 678 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1230 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Atom x5-Z8300 | Intel Core i3-2370M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Cherry Trail | Sandy Bridge |
| Date de sortie | Q2'15 | 1 January 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3096 | 3088 |
| Processor Number | x5-Z8300 | i3-2370M |
| Série | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $225 | |
| Prix maintenant | $39.81 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.53 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.44 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 85C (PGA); 100C (BGA) |
| Fréquence maximale | 1.84 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Taille de dé | 149 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB | |
| Cache L3 | 3072 KB | |
| Compte de transistor | 624 Million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 12.8 GB/s | 21.3 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L-RS 1600 | DDR3 1066/1333 |
Graphiques |
||
| Unités d’éxécution | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 500 MHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 2 GB | |
| Device ID | 0x116 | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 2 | 2 |
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| SDVO | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B); 31mm x 24mm (BGA1023) |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | |
| Prise courants soutenu | UTFCBGA592 | PPGA988 |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 1 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x1 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
| Révision USB | 3.0 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® AVX | |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Atom x5-Z8300 avec des autres
IntelAtom x5-Z8300 vs
IntelCore i5-520M
IntelAtom x5-Z8300 vs
IntelCore i3-2330M
IntelAtom x5-Z8300 vs
IntelPentium B960
