Intel Atom x5-Z8500 versus Intel Atom x5-Z8300
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Atom x5-Z8500 et Intel Atom x5-Z8300 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Atom x5-Z8500
- Environ 22% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.24 GHz versus 1.84 GHz
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 631 versus 455
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1236 versus 814
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 207 versus 157
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 675 versus 490
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.985 versus 1.82
- 9.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 85.204 versus 8.772
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.507 versus 0.093
- 12.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.184 versus 0.339
- 5.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.893 versus 1.16
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 500 versus 371
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1685 versus 678
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1374 versus 1230
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 500 versus 371
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1685 versus 678
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1374 versus 1230
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.24 GHz versus 1.84 GHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 631 versus 455 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1236 versus 814 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 207 versus 157 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 675 versus 490 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.985 versus 1.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 85.204 versus 8.772 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.507 versus 0.093 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.184 versus 0.339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.893 versus 1.16 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 500 versus 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1685 versus 678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1374 versus 1230 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 500 versus 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1685 versus 678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1374 versus 1230 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Atom x5-Z8500
CPU 2: Intel Atom x5-Z8300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Atom x5-Z8500 | Intel Atom x5-Z8300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 631 | 455 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1236 | 814 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 207 | 157 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 675 | 490 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.985 | 1.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 85.204 | 8.772 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.507 | 0.093 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.184 | 0.339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.893 | 1.16 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 500 | 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1685 | 678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1374 | 1230 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 500 | 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1685 | 678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1374 | 1230 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Atom x5-Z8500 | Intel Atom x5-Z8300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Cherry Trail | Cherry Trail |
| Date de sortie | Q1'15 | Q2'15 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2457 | 3109 |
| Processor Number | x5-Z8500 | x5-Z8300 |
| Série | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.44 GHz | 1.44 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 90°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.24 GHz | 1.84 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 1 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 12.8 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | LPDDR3 1600 | DDR3L-RS 1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Unités d’éxécution | 12 | 12 |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 600 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 2 |
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 2560x1600 | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 17mm x 17mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | 2 W |
| Prise courants soutenu | UTFCBGA1380 | UTFCBGA592 |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 2 | 1 |
| Nombre des ports USB | 3 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 2x1, 1x2 | 1x1 |
| Révision USB | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Atom x5-Z8500 avec des autres
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
IntelCore i7-620UM
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
IntelCore i5-4300Y
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
AMDA4-9120e
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
IntelCeleron 7305
