Intel Celeron 3855U versus Intel Core m7-6Y75
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron 3855U et Intel Core m7-6Y75 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron 3855U
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 16 GB
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2907 versus 1203
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2907 versus 1203
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 16 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2907 versus 1203 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2907 versus 1203 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core m7-6Y75
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 4.5 Watt versus 15 Watt
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1358 versus 900
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2337 versus 1219
- 7.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2859 versus 381
- 7x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 5114 versus 731
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1017 versus 814
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1892 versus 1618
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1017 versus 814
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1892 versus 1618
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt versus 15 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1358 versus 900 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2337 versus 1219 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2859 versus 381 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5114 versus 731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 versus 814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1892 versus 1618 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 versus 814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1892 versus 1618 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 3855U
CPU 2: Intel Core m7-6Y75
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Celeron 3855U | Intel Core m7-6Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 900 | 1358 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1219 | 2337 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 381 | 2859 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 731 | 5114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 814 | 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1618 | 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2907 | 1203 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 814 | 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1618 | 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2907 | 1203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.078 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 33.362 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.245 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.849 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.682 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Celeron 3855U | Intel Core m7-6Y75 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Skylake | Skylake |
| Date de sortie | Q4'15 | 1 September 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1945 | 1949 |
| Processor Number | 3855U | M7-6Y75 |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor 3000 Series | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ m Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $393 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 4 GT/s OPI |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | 100°C |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
| Taille de dé | 99 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB | |
| Cache L3 | 4 MB | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.10 GHz | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 34.1 GB/s | 29.8 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600 | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x1906 | 0x191E |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 900 MHz | 1.00 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | Intel® HD Graphics 515 |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096@2304@24Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur WiDi | 1080p | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | 3.5 W |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 42mm X 24mm | 20mm X 16.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1356 | FCBGA1515 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 4.5 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-up | 7 W | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 10 | 10 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron 3855U avec des autres
IntelCeleron 3855U vs
IntelCore m7-6Y75
IntelCeleron 3855U vs
IntelXeon E5-2608L v4
IntelCeleron 3855U vs
IntelCeleron 2000E
IntelCeleron 3855U vs
AMDGX-424CC
IntelCeleron 3855U vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCeleron 3855U vs
AMDR-272F
