Intel Celeron G3900 versus Intel Core i3-6100
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron G3900 et Intel Core i3-6100 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron G3900
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.745 versus 2.581
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.573 versus 3.445
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.745 versus 2.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.573 versus 3.445 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i3-6100
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 32% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.7 GHz versus 2.8 GHz
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2172 versus 1674
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 4126 versus 2134
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 906 versus 678
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1976 versus 1244
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 47.944 versus 34.175
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.3 versus 0.264
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.387 versus 1.171
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1558 versus 861
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3264 versus 1554
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5567 versus 2853
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1558 versus 861
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3264 versus 1554
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5567 versus 2853
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.7 GHz versus 2.8 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2172 versus 1674 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 4126 versus 2134 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 906 versus 678 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1976 versus 1244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 47.944 versus 34.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.3 versus 0.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.387 versus 1.171 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1558 versus 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3264 versus 1554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5567 versus 2853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1558 versus 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3264 versus 1554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5567 versus 2853 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G3900
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-6100
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Celeron G3900 | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1674 | 2172 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2134 | 4126 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 678 | 906 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1244 | 1976 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 2197 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.745 | 2.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 34.175 | 47.944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.264 | 0.3 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.171 | 1.387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.573 | 3.445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 861 | 1558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1554 | 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2853 | 5567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 861 | 1558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1554 | 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2853 | 5567 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Celeron G3900 | Intel Core i3-6100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Skylake | Skylake |
| Date de sortie | September 2015 | September 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $50 | $110 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2207 | 1460 |
| Prix maintenant | $52.62 | $147.49 |
| Processor Number | G3900 | i3-6100 |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.63 | 10.96 |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.80 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Taille de dé | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 4096 KB (shared) | 4096 KB (shared) |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 1400 million | 1400 million |
| Température de noyau maximale | 65°C | |
Mémoire |
||
| Soutien de la mémoire ECC | ||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 34.1 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x1902 | 0x1912 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 950 MHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 950 MHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | N / A | N / A |
| Résolution maximale sur WiDi | 1080p | 1080p |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | 51 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron G3900 avec des autres
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 420e
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
IntelCeleron G440
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
AMDFX-6120
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
AMDA4-5300B
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
IntelCore i5-4460T
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
IntelPentium G5600E
