Intel Celeron G3900 vs Intel Core i3-6100
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Celeron G3900 und Intel Core i3-6100 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Celeron G3900
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.745 vs 2.581
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.573 vs 3.445
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.745 vs 2.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.573 vs 3.445 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i3-6100
- 2 Mehr Kanäle: 4 vs 2
- Etwa 32% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2172 vs 1674
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 4126 vs 2134
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 906 vs 678
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1976 vs 1244
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 47.944 vs 34.175
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.3 vs 0.264
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.387 vs 1.171
- Etwa 81% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1558 vs 861
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3264 vs 1554
- Etwa 95% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5567 vs 2853
- Etwa 81% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1558 vs 861
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3264 vs 1554
- Etwa 95% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5567 vs 2853
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2172 vs 1674 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 4126 vs 2134 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 906 vs 678 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1976 vs 1244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 47.944 vs 34.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.3 vs 0.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.387 vs 1.171 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1558 vs 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3264 vs 1554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5567 vs 2853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1558 vs 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3264 vs 1554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5567 vs 2853 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G3900
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-6100
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G3900 | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1674 | 2172 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2134 | 4126 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 678 | 906 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1244 | 1976 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 2197 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.745 | 2.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 34.175 | 47.944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.264 | 0.3 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.171 | 1.387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.573 | 3.445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 861 | 1558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1554 | 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2853 | 5567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 861 | 1558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1554 | 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2853 | 5567 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Celeron G3900 | Intel Core i3-6100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Skylake | Skylake |
| Startdatum | September 2015 | September 2015 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $50 | $110 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2207 | 1460 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $52.62 | $147.49 |
| Processor Number | G3900 | i3-6100 |
| Serie | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 17.63 | 10.96 |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.80 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Matrizengröße | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 4096 KB (shared) | 4096 KB (shared) |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1400 million | 1400 million |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 65°C | |
Speicher |
||
| ECC-Speicherunterstützung | ||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 34.1 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x1902 | 0x1912 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 950 MHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 950 MHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | N / A | N / A |
| Maximale Auflösung über WiDi | 1080p | 1080p |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 51 Watt | 51 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Celeron G3900 mit anderen
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 420e
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
IntelCeleron G440
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
AMDFX-6120
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
AMDA4-5300B
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
IntelCore i5-4460T
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
IntelPentium G5600E
