Intel Celeron N3450 versus Intel Pentium N4200
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron N3450 et Intel Pentium N4200 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium N4200
- Environ 14% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.50 GHz versus 2.20 GHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 857 versus 768
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2164 versus 1991
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 317 versus 282
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 975 versus 934
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 659 versus 507
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1844 versus 872
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3147 versus 1618
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 659 versus 507
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1844 versus 872
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3147 versus 1618
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.50 GHz versus 2.20 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 857 versus 768 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2164 versus 1991 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 317 versus 282 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 975 versus 934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 659 versus 507 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1844 versus 872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3147 versus 1618 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 659 versus 507 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1844 versus 872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3147 versus 1618 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N3450
CPU 2: Intel Pentium N4200
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Celeron N3450 | Intel Pentium N4200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 768 | 857 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1991 | 2164 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 282 | 317 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 934 | 975 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 507 | 659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 872 | 1844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1618 | 3147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 507 | 659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 872 | 1844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1618 | 3147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.711 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.677 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Celeron N3450 | Intel Pentium N4200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Apollo Lake | Apollo Lake |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2016 | 1 September 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $107 | $161 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2556 | 2326 |
| Prix maintenant | $165.70 | $196.49 |
| Processor Number | N3450 | N4200 |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor N Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.26 | 3.02 |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | 105°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.20 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x5A85 | 0x5A84 |
| Unités d’éxécution | 12 | 18 |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 700 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | Intel® HD Graphics 505 |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 24mm x 31mm | 24mm x 31mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | 4 W |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1296 | FCBGA1296 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| LAN integré | ||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 6 | 6 |
| Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre des ports USB | 8 | 8 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 |
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | 2 |
| UART | ||
| Révision USB | 2.0/3.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron N3450 avec des autres
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
IntelCore 2 Solo SU3500
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
IntelCore i5-3317U
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
IntelCore i3-3229Y
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
AMDA4-9120e
