Intel Celeron N3450 vs Intel Pentium N4200
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Celeron N3450 und Intel Pentium N4200 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Pentium N4200
- Etwa 14% höhere Taktfrequenz: 2.50 GHz vs 2.20 GHz
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 857 vs 768
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2164 vs 1991
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 317 vs 282
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 975 vs 934
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 659 vs 507
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1844 vs 872
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3147 vs 1618
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 659 vs 507
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1844 vs 872
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3147 vs 1618
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.50 GHz vs 2.20 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 857 vs 768 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2164 vs 1991 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 317 vs 282 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 975 vs 934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 659 vs 507 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1844 vs 872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3147 vs 1618 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 659 vs 507 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1844 vs 872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3147 vs 1618 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N3450
CPU 2: Intel Pentium N4200
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron N3450 | Intel Pentium N4200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 768 | 857 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1991 | 2164 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 282 | 317 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 934 | 975 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 507 | 659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 872 | 1844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1618 | 3147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 507 | 659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 872 | 1844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1618 | 3147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.711 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.677 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Celeron N3450 | Intel Pentium N4200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Apollo Lake | Apollo Lake |
| Startdatum | 1 September 2016 | 1 September 2016 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $107 | $161 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2556 | 2326 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $165.70 | $196.49 |
| Processor Number | N3450 | N4200 |
| Serie | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor N Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 3.26 | 3.02 |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C | 105°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.20 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x5A85 | 0x5A84 |
| Ausführungseinheiten | 12 | 18 |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 700 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | Intel® HD Graphics 505 |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 24mm x 31mm | 24mm x 31mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | 4 W |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1296 | FCBGA1296 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Integriertes LAN | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 6 | 6 |
| Maximale Anzahl der SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der USB-Ports | 8 | 8 |
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 |
| Gesamtzahl der SATA-Anschlüsse | 2 | 2 |
| UART | ||
| USB-Überarbeitung | 2.0/3.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage Technologie (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Celeron N3450 mit anderen
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
IntelCore 2 Solo SU3500
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
IntelCore i5-3317U
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
IntelCore i3-3229Y
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
AMDA4-9120e
