Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 versus Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 et Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 963 versus 922
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.247 versus 0.23
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.219 versus 13.234
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.073 versus 0.049
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.772 versus 1.273
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2009 versus 15 July 2008 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 963 versus 922 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.247 versus 0.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.219 versus 13.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.073 versus 0.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.448 versus 0.446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.772 versus 1.273 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
- Environ 17% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 105°C versus 90°C
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 863 versus 830
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 302 versus 291
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 517 versus 505
| Caractéristiques | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C versus 90°C |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 863 versus 830 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 302 versus 291 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 517 versus 505 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 963 | 922 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 830 | 863 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 291 | 302 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 505 | 517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.247 | 0.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.219 | 13.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.073 | 0.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.448 | 0.446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.772 | 1.273 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Penryn | Penryn |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3214 | 3222 |
| Prix maintenant | $229.99 | $297.01 |
| Processor Number | P7550 | P8400 |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.94 | 1.44 |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $209 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.26 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Taille de dé | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| Cache L2 | 3 MB | 3072 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 105°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.26 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 410 million | 410 million |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
| Rangée de tension VID | 1.050V-1.150V | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35 mm x 35mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | PGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 25 Watt |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 avec des autres
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P8400
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SP9300
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core SU2300
